tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12624260.post111652651728843550..comments2023-09-16T08:57:22.030-07:00Comments on oogu: midnight nerdnessBughttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05112909837995062972noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12624260.post-1116621298491061052005-05-20T13:34:00.000-07:002005-05-20T13:34:00.000-07:00Actually, when I gathered in the dark, I was sayin...Actually, when I gathered in the dark, I was saying "Thanks, George, for not completely ruining your legacy by making a 3-peat of suck." I mean, honestly, everyone but the most diehard fans are in 'agreeance' (to quote fred durst) that ep 1 and 2 sucked. And by making ep 3 good, which I'll agree to, he made his star wars library 67% good and 33% awful. At the very least, this is better than the Matrix can say.<BR/><BR/>It poses the question. Can a trilogy as big as star wars ever repeat the trick after years of fame? If the evidence is Ep 3, it can. But if the evidence is the entirety of the new trilogy, it can't. Why is it that a guy like George Lucas was able to make 3 amazing films in the 70s/80s, couldn't do it again for ep 1 and 2, but then could do it again for ep 3? How can you be so seemingly steady in your genius... seemingly steady in your suck, and pull it back to genius? How many ways can I ask the same question? How many different versions of this poser are there? If I said "it poses the question," how come I keep asking more questions? Will I ever stop?<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>yes...EmoRiothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10832669840890970845noreply@blogger.com